Nucleosome collections
Note: Di-nucleotide frequencies below are computed from the center alignment, using a 3 basepair moving average window. Yeast nucleosome-bound sequences were measured by us, chicken nucleosome-bound sequences were measured by Satchwell et al. (JMB, 1986), and the in vitro selected nucleosome-bound sequences were measured by Lowary et al. (JMB, 1998).
| |
Yeast (in vivo) |
Yeast (in vitro) |
Chicken (in vivo) |
Mouse (in vitro) |
In Vitro selection |
| Sequences |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Center alignment |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Di-nucleotide frequencies (center alignment) |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
In vivo nucleosome occupancy measurements at regions with high predicted occupancy
 | Experimental data (details are explained in the spreadsheet. See text for additional details). |
In vitro nucleosome binding affinity measurements of mutated sequences
 | Tested sequences (aligned as in Figure) |
 | Binding affinities to all tested sequences |
Genome-wide encoded nucleosome organization of Yeast (predicted by our model)
Files below provide details of our predictions, including the set of predicted highly stable nucleosomes, the predicted nucleosome occupancy at each basepair, the single best nucleosome organization on the genome, and the raw nucleosome binding energy landscape per basepair, which is the basis of the genome-wide organizations. Files have six columns with the following
format: chromosome (column 1), unique id (column 2), start basepair (column 3), end basepair (column 4), internal use (column 5), value (column 6).
| |
Yeast model predictions |
Chicken model predictions |
| Highly stable nucleosomes (stability probability > 0.5) |
 |
 |
| Highly stable nucleosomes (stability probability > 0.2) |
 |
 |
| Nucleosome occupancy at each basepair in yeast genome |
 |
 |
| Single best genome-wide nucleosome configuration |
 |
 |
| Raw nucleosome binding log-ratio per basepair |
 |
 |
| Probability of starting a nucleosome at each basepair |
 |
 |
Since the publication of our paper, we have been working on improving our model in several directions. Below we provide predictions from our current working model, updated
March 2008:
| |
Updated model |
| Nucleosome occupancy at each basepair in yeast genome |
 |
| Raw nucleosome binding log-ratio per basepair in yeast genome |
 |
Encoded nucleosome occupancy by chromosomal regions (predicted by our model)
For each type of chromosomal region below, the associated table below provides the average nucleosome occupancy predicted by our model across each genomic region of the associated type (for example, the 'coding region' table provides the average nucleosome occupancy per basepair predicted by our model for the coding region of each of gene in yeast).
| | Yeast model predictions |
| Coding regions |  |
| Intergenic (unique promoter) |  |
| Intergenic (divergent promoter) |  |
| Intergenic (not a promoter) |  |
| Centromeres |  |
| Autonomously Replicating Sequences (ARS) |  |
| Telomeres |  |
| Protein-DNA binding sites |  |
| Ribosomal RNAs |  |
| Transfer RNAs (tRNAs) |  |
In-vivo mapped nucleosome positions
 | Genomic locations of in-vivo nucleosomes. |
Literature-mapped nucleosome positions
 | Literature mapped nucleosomes (99 nucleosomes at 11 loci). |
Yeast Genome
The data files above were generated and are given in coordinates that correspond to the yeast genome version downloaded from SGD on January 2006, and is available
here.